From: werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 50254171f953e192997772d3c65e40c065a4114cc0189ca3efbe814a64078192
Message ID: <1zO8lOwsccw0077yn@io.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-21 23:48:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Jan 95 15:48:40 PST
From: werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 95 15:48:40 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Freenet Remailers (Again)
Message-ID: <1zO8lOwsccw0077yn@io.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I keep periodically asking this question, but has any progress been made on
making the remailer software compatible with the remailer software found on
Freenets?
The question is even more pertinent now that we seem to be having a problem
maintaining a satisfactory number of remailers operational and reliable. Is
there any consensus as to whether it can be done or not? I'd give it a shot
using my Cleveland account to see how workable it is (ie, how long it takes
for the Freenet operators to shut it down :>).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBLyGQcHBFBj7pSNyhAQGC2wf/ZwzouQWeUXCok0DgfxRUViBQdNsQhKAE
sb0ODG5EubBCDFjIr9KacMyv6++OiqlOZfhNH9X+PCKOa21zJ5AjvNazfpETZnrw
zRHgQscOlbdG+lLb/DMZSwIt7cKMaRgY2fp26W3nd20ORiWFtzMpXrSVKj5p/RkZ
c4ygPUGu6yGUDSltl1HMnZW4yjkU9yOBiGY39xubmF/4idmNcZFFj7rpGEpQMncd
3VNyeCz7+yDhRvcSXP8Qazv38R79d3FTgMTOJ82gcXUSfoSCrvQHQvFkLOcS/xGv
pmYX+wSqDvLfT+jKdq3t3D4jwVa0FLBN+dMhpIsrUu4xLDLONnYHWA==
=Pg+A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1995
Return to “werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)”
1995-01-21 (Sat, 21 Jan 95 15:48:40 PST) - Freenet Remailers (Again) - werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)