From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
To: Alan Bostick <abostick@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 51140437264852f14ebfe39038619c7f4f6d79a867b29e3d0ec0524ad675fc7d
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950111121303.11283F-100000@access3.digex.net>
Reply To: <ZwQ4lyczBSQA075yn@netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-11 17:17:08 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Jan 95 09:17:08 PST
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 95 09:17:08 PST
To: Alan Bostick <abostick@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Data Haven problems
In-Reply-To: <ZwQ4lyczBSQA075yn@netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950111121303.11283F-100000@access3.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 9 Jan 1995, Alan Bostick wrote:
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 1995 13:46:11 -0800
> From: Alan Bostick <abostick@netcom.com>
> To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com, dfloyd@io.com
> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: Data Haven problems
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> In article <9501090448.AA14477@anchor.ho.att.com>, you wrote:
>
> > Filtering by filename and type can also be useful - if you don't allow
> > files named *.gif and *.jpg, users may be less likely to
> > spam you with pornography. Namespace control in general is an issue -
> > do users get to choose filenames, or list directories, or do they
> > have to know the names of files to retrieve.
> > Another issue is whether files can only be retrieved by the sender -
> > probably a local policy issue.
>
> Pornographic images aren't spam _per_se._ What makes them troublesome is
> the huge number of people who wish to download them when their
> availability is widely known. (My ISP's ftp site is being bogged down
> by lots of accesses; it is speculated that these are people trying to
> access pornography kept there.)
In many ways this shows how publically available porn could just pummel
traffic analysis.
>
> The obvious fix here is the same as the proposed fix for remailer
> spamming: charge for access.
>
> As a (presumably) fixed-location data haven, one would want to be able
> to use some kind of anonymous e-money for payment, but one could also
> use good, old-fashioned credit card numbers, too.
>
> The feelthy peexture business might well be the cash cow that keeps a
> data-haven/fortress remailer afloat (if that's not too mixed a metaphor).
>
> | PROOF-READER, n: A malefactor who atones for
> Alan Bostick | making your writing nonsense by permitting
> abostick@netcom.com | the compositor to make it unintelligible.
> finger for PGP public key | Ambrose Bierce, THE DEVIL'S DICTIONARY
> Key fingerprint: |
> 50 22 FB 46 41 A3 17 9D F7 33 FF E1 4E 1C 89 79 +legal_kludge=off
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.1
>
> iQB1AgUBLxGxHOVevBgtmhnpAQEEnAL/blauOWwrahdpEK+NbH4WC5V5fekmUYdg
> tT5VU+d2C5PGF9Bm5cXtNlZczbI84f+jsBmxRDlXQAsec56D7M7ZwjBMcp2X8t9Z
> +FlsU90fRN3NGbYOK/vlSOmzjPBQxf8A
> =gvPB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa - wichtig!
Return to January 1995
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)”