1995-01-19 - Re: Does encrypted equal safe?

Header Data

From: pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 5c936dcf19798ac59aab380c6c54a371d07efda8ee2f2859572a8a7adbe714c8
Message ID: <9501182334.AB09451@eri.erinet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-19 00:24:19 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Jan 95 16:24:19 PST

Raw message

From: pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 95 16:24:19 PST
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: Does encrypted equal safe?
Message-ID: <9501182334.AB09451@eri.erinet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 04:55 PM 1/17/95, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> ... In my law school they taught that the burden of proof in a 
>criminal case was on the government.

Unless of course the case involves porn, drugs, etc, in which case the 
current practice in the American legal system places the onus on the 
accused, regardless of what the Constitution requires.  Civil forfeiture is 
a fine example of this, along with requiring porn producers to demonstrate 
the age of their models, etc ad nauseum.

    --Paul J. Ste. Marie
      pstemari@well.sf.ca.us, pstemari@erinet.com






Thread