From: pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 5c936dcf19798ac59aab380c6c54a371d07efda8ee2f2859572a8a7adbe714c8
Message ID: <9501182334.AB09451@eri.erinet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-19 00:24:19 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Jan 95 16:24:19 PST
From: pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 95 16:24:19 PST
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: Does encrypted equal safe?
Message-ID: <9501182334.AB09451@eri.erinet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 04:55 PM 1/17/95, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> ... In my law school they taught that the burden of proof in a
>criminal case was on the government.
Unless of course the case involves porn, drugs, etc, in which case the
current practice in the American legal system places the onus on the
accused, regardless of what the Constitution requires. Civil forfeiture is
a fine example of this, along with requiring porn producers to demonstrate
the age of their models, etc ad nauseum.
--Paul J. Ste. Marie
pstemari@well.sf.ca.us, pstemari@erinet.com
Return to January 1995
Return to “pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)”
1995-01-19 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 16:24:19 PST) - Re: Does encrypted equal safe? - pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)