cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-01-13 - Re: Data Havens..A consumer perspective

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5cc36c8b291cc807c4087cbac2e5311a6bf1eb3da630db57181e677cc3e721dd
Message ID: <199501131919.LAA02994@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9501130154.B28998-0100000@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-13 19:21:15 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 11:21:15 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 11:21:15 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Data Havens..A consumer perspective
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9501130154.B28998-0100000@nesta.pr.mcs.net>
Message-ID: <199501131919.LAA02994@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: Nesta Stubbs <root@nesta.pr.mcs.net>

   are you saying that there is an agreement between the data haven operator 
   and the user?

There's always an agreement, implicit or explicit.

   Right now were are getting into so many fraggin different definitions of 
   data haven, that this conversation is loopng over itself infinetly.  

Well, the 'data haven' that started the topic of discussion was a
misnomer; it's really an off-site storage facility.  I don't know
about the rest of the list, but I'm more concerned with discussing
working code.

Eric

Thread