1995-01-26 - Re: Reordering, not Latency (Was: Re: Remailer)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Message Hash: 62eaa191735adbbf3acbdd25a0a5ed63ed5170b834358b89e2625c44d6d564a0
Message ID: <9501261719.AA16636@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199501260638.BAA07072@duke.bwh.harvard.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-26 17:20:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 09:20:17 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 09:20:17 PST
To: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Reordering, not Latency (Was: Re: Remailer)
In-Reply-To: <199501260638.BAA07072@duke.bwh.harvard.edu>
Message-ID: <9501261719.AA16636@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Adam Shostack says:
> It may be that the FBI has a couple of Suns handling the whole
> remailer network right now.

If they are doing that, they are violating the ECPA. They are allowed
to monitor only those things they have a warrant to monitor (with, of
course, all those lovely National Security exceptions). This is not to
say that it isn't being done, but it can't be used in court.

Perry





Thread