1995-01-11 - Re: Why use plastic for remailers and DH?

Header Data

From: “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 69fd46e96937fc9eb9474790eb546868f8fc0930af53a6b89a93ebabc2a60706
Message ID: <199501110657.BAA06563@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-11 06:52:30 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Jan 95 22:52:30 PST

Raw message

From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 95 22:52:30 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why use plastic for remailers and DH?
Message-ID: <199501110657.BAA06563@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Angus Patterson writes:
> why would anybody want to use something as completely traceable as a 
> credit card to pay for a remailer or a data haven?

Apart from what Russ Nelson observed, safety in numbers is potentially great.
If, say, 15% of the net.populace does it, then it won't be terribly
interesting to know that some particular person has done it. I suppose a
transition period would be helpful, in which credit card-financed bandwidth
is increased with a load of low security traffic.

 -L. Futplex McCarthy


- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1

iQCVAwUBLxOAC2f7YYibNzjpAQHFxAP9EphOcjL96QDuuJQ7eFLv/I3Ci0K6NkMI
tg9bUODYUMVqHs/2dTm8YhxNgOmx90uDb9MPx+EDDrtFZDAT9AIs8GQf1OdsyPrh
Hg9PDIB4jT+JMfY3zqERePW+0Ac5TWoxQto0uQH8lRRWvNcp0R7N/sdYOwIRRTK8
o5BGm0wyJHg=
=qt2F
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBLxOBOyoZzwIn1bdtAQHAXAF+Jcfrh9xhfx7MlS6oK5Cfu4E96P+rOuGW
Xto/oQG7HcqAbl2adr0zyMQnfh4alDgk
=FtZw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread