From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 80f2bf8bdc5bdf5afe9059b35b43bf9f3c5d4f75146a8cba67a4d0329aea3166
Message ID: <9501192040.AA27218@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-19 20:47:08 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Jan 95 12:47:08 PST
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 95 12:47:08 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: UUNET Customer Liaison: USENET "netiquette" Reminder
Message-ID: <9501192040.AA27218@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> It would appear that UUNET does not consider themselves to be a common
> carrier any more -- they now claim the right to cut sites off for
> violating netiquette.
Strange.
First, they were never a common carrier: they went to some legal pains
to get registered as an enhanced service provider. I don't know what
the differences are, but when the first "Internet Porn" article by Joe
Abernathy appeared years ago, Rick wasn't worried. He told me ESP was
better then CC, but I don't remember why (perhaps it was no FCC regulation?)
It's unclear how this new policy affects their ESP status.
/r$
Return to January 1995
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
1995-01-19 (Thu, 19 Jan 95 12:47:08 PST) - Re: UUNET Customer Liaison: USENET “netiquette” Reminder - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>