From: Dave Banisar <tc@phantom.com>
To: Harry Bartholomew <bart@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 8bd370ba5d66cd19ac48637f966358f491189ab5e14380bb1d2f9857afbbcdab
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9501241047.B21387-0100000@mindvox>
Reply To: <199501241124.DAA24739@netcom17.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-24 15:46:16 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Jan 95 07:46:16 PST
From: Dave Banisar <tc@phantom.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 95 07:46:16 PST
To: Harry Bartholomew <bart@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: DOJ Computer Seizure Guidelines
In-Reply-To: <199501241124.DAA24739@netcom17.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9501241047.B21387-0100000@mindvox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Actually we didnt have to sue them for once to get it. I guess
they wanted to make it public. The encryption section is interesting.
They seem to be admitting that there are 5th amendment issues related to
disclosing your key and that they may have to immunize people before
forcing them to give their keys up.
Dave
On Tue, 24 Jan 1995, Harry Bartholomew wrote:
>
> Seen on comp.society.privacy. This document was obtained
> by an FOIA suit by EPIC. I ftp'd from the cpsr.org but even
> at 2:30 a.m. PST the 315 Kbytes took an excruciating 481 seconds.
>
> For those on netcom its on /ftp/pub/ba/bart easily available,
> if others can get through to ftp.netcom.com at least the
> transfer might be faster than cpsr.
>
> Encrypted information is dealt with on pps 54-55 in particular.
> I'll leave conclusions to our lawyerly types.
>
Return to January 1995
Return to “Dave Banisar <tc@phantom.com>”