1995-01-26 - Re: FrameMaker, LaTeX, Mac, PC, UNIX, …

Header Data

From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 908d6bf8c7409ae0731ec78eecd2ee24f4f33e3384103b18ea0754ee95dbeb1c
Message ID: <v0300110cab4ceb6302f4@[140.174.229.224]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-26 06:06:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Jan 95 22:06:06 PST

Raw message

From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 95 22:06:06 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FrameMaker, LaTeX, Mac, PC, UNIX, ...
Message-ID: <v0300110cab4ceb6302f4@[140.174.229.224]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 21:13 1/25/95, Timothy C. May wrote:

>...but to say that
>popular applications can be--and have been--ported to Unix. Many of
>you presumably have first-hand knowledge of this, with apps like
>Mathematica, FrameMaker, WordPerfect, etc. on Unix boxes as well as
>PCs and Macs.

I say this only to defend by Pedantics degree, but I believe that
FrameMaker was originally a UNIX product that was horribly ported to the
Macintosh.  (I had the unfortunate experience of using the first Mac
incarnotion; I racked up some pretty good karma... :-)

>This is separate, I think, from the issue of teaching secretaries
>LaTex...that sounds truly evil. (8-))

Did that ;-)  It's amazing how much of office routine can be done with the
simple application of cut-and-paste boilerplate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>       San Francisco, California  |
Digital Jungle Consulting Services     http://www.jungle.com/msattler/ |
                                                                       |
And so these men of Indostan/ disputed long and loud/ each in his own  |
opinion/ exceeding stiff and strong/ though each was partly right/ and |
all were in the wrong! - John Godfrey Saxe                             |







Thread