From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9203ee0d28d8b593289bb9294685679345052a9e84629d4005b81b34a980cf30
Message ID: <v01510102ab5233825e8e@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-30 06:35:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Jan 95 22:35:03 PST
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 95 22:35:03 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks
Message-ID: <v01510102ab5233825e8e@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 9:39 PM 1/29/95, anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com wrote:
>Some people on this list swear they never have to drop to a command
>line with the cool tools they use with their SLIP accounts (except to
>change their password). If that's true, then any "advantage" unix has
>is washed away. How will the unix market grow (relative to other more
>popular OS's) if internet access tools run the same on Windows and
>OS/2 and Mac's as they do on unix?
It is true, I swear <g>
I am a Mac person. UNIX is pretty far from the Mac OS. Nonetheless, I am
about to buy a cheap 486 (any recomendations?) on which I will install
FreeBSD to run an Internet server. Once Apple will officially relase their
dirt cheap multi-processor servers that run A/UX only, I'll probably buy
one of those. Why am I getting a UNIX machine? Because there is nothing out
there in world of operating systems that does the job as well as UNIX when
it comes to networking.
-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
Return to January 1995
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1995-01-30 (Sun, 29 Jan 95 22:35:03 PST) - Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)