From: daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9829cee0aa67d838a492076d446f2f1329d15bb0c44717ab1bd972b628399590
Message ID: <199501300647.WAA00604@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-30 06:48:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 29 Jan 95 22:48:35 PST
From: daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 95 22:48:35 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: UNIX bashing?
Message-ID: <199501300647.WAA00604@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
You wrote:
>Microsoft hasn't really made any attempt to enbrace the UNIX community.
>Why should we embrace Microsoft?
Gravity has made no attempt to embrace me, why should I embrace gravity?
Because it's a force-of-nature bigger than any of us. It's not a matter
of embracing (or not embracing), it's a matter of recognizing the
obvious.
Also, just as an historical note, the offical internal policy at
Microsoft until about 1986-7 was that DOS was a stopgap measure that
would eventually be replaced by a 16-bit version of Xenix (M/S's
proprietary Unix variant) that would ship with the 286 based systems. It
was the MARKET's rejection of Xenix that forced Microsoft to reluctantly
look towards OS/2 and Windows rather than Unix as its future flagship
OS. Again, this has nothing to do with Unix's obvious technical merits,
but the triumph of social, market and economic forces over technical
forces. Look at the fact that the existing global code-base consists
overwhelmingly of Cobol closely followed by dBase with C/C++ trailing
way down in the noise. The realworld is a messy and complex place.
Dale H.
Return to January 1995
Return to “daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))”
1995-01-30 (Sun, 29 Jan 95 22:48:35 PST) - UNIX bashing? - daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))