1995-01-17 - Re: Abuse Complaint out of homer@rahul.net
Header Data
From: hroller@metronet.com (Michael L. Acklin)
To: Homer Wilson Smith <Remailer-Operators@c2.org>
Message Hash: 98800c15f9cb986fa6d0285e76ec71e01d1aa86ba76daebe289df20ea46c7887
Message ID: <0hp6lS$TgAh4077yn@metronet.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950116201426.6889A-100000@math>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-17 03:53:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 Jan 95 19:53:27 PST
Raw message
From: hroller@metronet.com (Michael L. Acklin)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 95 19:53:27 PST
To: Homer Wilson Smith <Remailer-Operators@c2.org>
Subject: Re: Abuse Complaint out of homer@rahul.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950116201426.6889A-100000@math>
Message-ID: <0hp6lS$TgAh4077yn@metronet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Homer,
I am going to have to agree with you on this. A Sysadmin would have
to see the messages or data that is suppose be harassing the
complaintant. What I say is harassment may be different from what you
say it is.
Michael L. Acklin ------------>hroller@metronet.com
Finger for Pub Key
or MIT Key Server
PGP Fingerprint: 86 D6 52 87 E4 FD 64 05 63 BA CA AA B8 A9 04
Thread
Return to January 1995
- Return to “Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>”
Return to “hroller@metronet.com (Michael L. Acklin)”
- 1995-01-17 (Mon, 16 Jan 95 17:27:38 PST) - Abuse Complaint out of homer@rahul.net - Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>
- 1995-01-17 (Mon, 16 Jan 95 19:53:27 PST) - Re: Abuse Complaint out of homer@rahul.net - hroller@metronet.com (Michael L. Acklin)