1995-01-31 - the moderation principle

Header Data

From: rkmoore@iol.ie (Richard K. Moore)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c7436d0cf4693973d526415020a1861897852a7b3672b473c7667e091bb6dc62
Message ID: <199501312014.UAA02292@GPO.iol.ie>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-31 20:14:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 Jan 95 12:14:41 PST

Raw message

From: rkmoore@iol.ie (Richard K. Moore)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 95 12:14:41 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: the moderation principle
Message-ID: <199501312014.UAA02292@GPO.iol.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




    From: alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)

    If strong government resulted in liberty and freedom, then the
    most intrusive, all-encompassing governments would result in
    its citizens having the most liberty.  Is this the case?  I would
    look at the (former) Soviet Union, Iran, Cuba, East Germany, etc.,
    for your answer.


In all things, moderation. If I like salt on my steak, that does not mean
the most salt is the best.

Thinking in fundmentalist extremes severely limits your room for creative
problem solving.

You don't do that when you discuss cypers -- you don't take rigid sides of
"subway" vs "mixmaster", and paint the other side as fools becauase their
system would be silly if taken to its extremes. You learn from one another.

Be as creative about political possibilities.



-rkm
                      _____________________
                         Richard K Moore
                         > cyber scribe <
             citizenships:   USA   ;    cyberspace
                    homes: Ireland ; <rkmoore@iol.ie>
                      _____________________








Thread