1995-01-19 - Re: Good “Economist” article on Cyberspace

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@netcom.com>
Message Hash: d533732fafb39f0166e2b9d3d3242003a6f9b87b884bb0e4631dc6f49c657554
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950118201336.15785A-100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <199501190038.QAA23631@netcom4.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-19 01:22:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Jan 95 17:22:42 PST

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 95 17:22:42 PST
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Good "Economist" article on Cyberspace
In-Reply-To: <199501190038.QAA23631@netcom4.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950118201336.15785A-100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Right Tim it was a great article in the Economist Tradition.  I'll post 
it as soon as it makes it into the databases.

Unblievable Barlow Quote:

On-line purists might want nothing to do with government, but government 
was likely to intrude anyway.  So the EFF sought to minimise the 
intrusion; "to keep Pharoh from following us into the Red Sea," as Mr. 
Barlow puts it.


I *want* Pharoh to follow us into the Red Sea, myself.

DCF

--
You don't have to be nice to nation states you meet on the way up if 
you're not coming back down.





Thread