From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 95 14:26:36 PST
To: eric@remailer.net
Subject: Re: Data Vaults (vs. Data Havens)
Message-ID: <9501232223.AA18759@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim and Eric write things like:
> I fully concur.  The connotations of the word "haven" imply activities
> that ordinary people don't see themselves doing.  This means that
> ordinary people won't generally use something called a "haven", even
> if they might use exactly the same service called something else.

We can always call them "Private Storage Servers" or some such;
an interesting question is whether the main uses will be
for retrieval by the storer, or by someone else, or by a bunch of others,
and how we describe the service may affect that.
		Bill