1995-01-27 - Re: Even more unix holy war. Was “Clinton freezes U.S. assets ..”

Header Data

From: lce@wwa.com (Larry E)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e5f0ef14333a0716853622f210671c4d12376aa163d4238e933b18f1cb6039cc
Message ID: <HLGAlG9s1erF075yn@wwa.com>
Reply To: <9501270314.AA01417@carbon.informix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-27 14:43:06 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Jan 95 06:43:06 PST

Raw message

From: lce@wwa.com (Larry E)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 95 06:43:06 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Even more unix holy war. Was "Clinton freezes U.S. assets .."
In-Reply-To: <9501270314.AA01417@carbon.informix.com>
Message-ID: <HLGAlG9s1erF075yn@wwa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <9501270314.AA01417@carbon.informix.com>,
jamesd@informix.com (James Donald) wrote:
> 
> If MIS sets up a decent word processor for the secretaries
> in UNIX or Windows, then the secretaries can do moron work
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> just as easily in either system.  In that sense Perry and
> Bill are perfectly correct.

Ah, yes.  Another knight-on-the-net.  Sorry folks, but I hate it when
the "little people" (other people's view)  are insulted.









Thread