1995-01-27 - Re: Reordering, not Latency (Was: Re: Remailer)
Header Data
From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ed428ea1f5e0d885198000936d8fb13b4a8489908d7f5f14424e95400cb64d8a
Message ID: <199501270442.UAA25311@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <9501261922.AA07092@ch1d157nwk>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-27 04:43:22 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 20:43:22 PST
Raw message
From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 20:43:22 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Reordering, not Latency (Was: Re: Remailer)
In-Reply-To: <9501261922.AA07092@ch1d157nwk>
Message-ID: <199501270442.UAA25311@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Is this even technically possible? That is, wholesale monitoring of
disparate portions of the net from a single access point.
If I were doing global Internet monitoring, I wouldn't be doing it
in-band. Too much cooperation by the vendors required; too much
discovery. Rather, I'd gain access to the trunks directly and do my
own demodulation and decoding.
Eric
Thread
Return to January 1995
- Return to “Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>”
- Return to “eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)”
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
- 1995-01-26 (Thu, 26 Jan 95 11:24:06 PST) - Re: Reordering, not Latency (Was: Re: Remailer) - Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
- 1995-01-26 (Thu, 26 Jan 95 15:53:05 PST) - Re: Reordering, not Latency (Was: Re: Remailer) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1995-01-27 (Thu, 26 Jan 95 20:43:22 PST) - Re: Reordering, not Latency (Was: Re: Remailer) - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)