From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
To: Richard Parratt <rparratt@london.micrognosis.com>
Message Hash: f71291bd3326ebcdd41ae4d095c4c5d5836139fb7f8d44c9fc52a6eed24aa66f
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950119062732.2080B-100000@xcalibur>
Reply To: <9501191012.AA04837@pero>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-19 11:41:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Jan 95 03:41:25 PST
From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 95 03:41:25 PST
To: Richard Parratt <rparratt@london.micrognosis.com>
Subject: Re: Internet, spamming, etc.
In-Reply-To: <9501191012.AA04837@pero>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950119062732.2080B-100000@xcalibur>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> One could theoretically have a package that sprayed UDP packets
> at a particular IP address, or even have a modified TCP
> that ignored disconnects. I think most service providers
> would regard using such code as being on a par with running
> a program that tried to telnet sequentially to all known IP
> addresses, trying common passwords on each.
Code exists to do all of the things that you've mentioned.
That was the original point of the discussion.
-jon
( --------[ Jonathan D. Cooper ]--------[ entropy@intnet.net ]-------- )
( PGP 2.6.2 keyprint: 31 50 8F 82 B9 79 ED C4 5B 12 A0 35 E0 9B C0 01 )
( home page: http://taz.hyperreal.com/~entropy/ ]---[ Key-ID: 4082CCB5 )
Return to January 1995
Return to “rparratt@london.micrognosis.com (Richard Parratt)”