1995-02-03 - Re: Remailer Unreliability
Header Data
From: nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1f03808ed7ab56afde1ea2b1c98c9b03904809a1cff95b30ee3ef9b3763a53b7
Message ID: <m0raRHW-0006WvC@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-03 16:50:25 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 08:50:25 PST
Raw message
From: nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 08:50:25 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer Unreliability
Message-ID: <m0raRHW-0006WvC@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
> Well, *I* think it is a good idea. But how does remailer1 know that
>remailer2 is both a remailer and down?
By attempting a connection to the SMTP port and using the alternate if
it fails?
Thread
Return to February 1995
Return to “nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)”
1995-02-03 (Fri, 3 Feb 95 08:50:25 PST) - Re: Remailer Unreliability - nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)