1995-02-01 - Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>
Message Hash: 2065706d464cf41738d666e91f6933d1dab2a1958617cc5d71ee64008f49f0eb
Message ID: <9502010206.AA25940@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950131175217.26397L-100000@eskimo.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-01 02:07:20 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 31 Jan 95 18:07:20 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 95 18:07:20 PST
To: Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: AT&T and VLSI Encryption device
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950131175217.26397L-100000@eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <9502010206.AA25940@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Charles Bell says:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > The manufacturers of switching equipment are supposed to make it easy
> > to get at individual conversations. Nothing in the act forces
> > customers to make the contents of the conversations comprehensable.
>
> That's a loophole in the law that Congress can plug in a day.  And one of 
> these days you can bet they will.
> 
> What then?

Then the law will be different. The question was one of what the law
is now.

Perry





Thread