1995-02-13 - Re: perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Message Hash: 207b32344188fcb5badebb9de89769789a42ea252dce932e476670ed7ef1ad08
Message ID: <9502132122.AA01505@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <9502132105.AA24452@anchor.ho.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-13 22:50:01 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 14:50:01 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 14:50:01 PST
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Subject: Re: perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well?
In-Reply-To: <9502132105.AA24452@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message-ID: <9502132122.AA01505@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



wcs@anchor.ho.att.com says:
> Of course, that's more useful for MIT, which owns Network 18,
> than for the thousands of people on networks 192.xxx.xxx;
> reverse lookups don't seem as reliable for Class C.

I've never had trouble with maintaining xxx.xxx.in-addr.arpa servers;
dunno what causes yours...

.pm

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”

• Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com”

• 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:14:18 PST) - perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well? - wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
  • 1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 14:50:01 PST) - Re: perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>