1995-02-14 - Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN

Header Data

From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
To: N/A
Message Hash: 3162fa127095a7a71796bc364921ff2ca3765f7bfb9ebb98504ff1aa89d61ed8
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950213223336.16909A-100000@chewy.wookie.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950213215125.2820B-100000@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-14 03:32:40 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:32:40 PST

Raw message

From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 19:32:40 PST
Subject: Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950213215125.2820B-100000@panix.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950213223336.16909A-100000@chewy.wookie.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 13 Feb 1995, Duncan Frissell wrote:

> If the bill doesn't cover ISPs, it is meaningless.  He never actually 
> *said* he'd work with Exon.  You have to be very careful on these shows.  
> He could, perhaps, have done a little better, but I detected no sellout.

Exon can say whatever he wants. Read the bill. There's no "except for 
ISPs" in there anywhere you know.


- dog







Thread