1995-02-09 - Re: MIME based remailing commands

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3ae1bc714ee509f8ccccbde18b20748fbc6468dbcc82bc4cdba18cf136c7f396
Message ID: <199502090419.UAA24497@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <199502082037.MAA02640@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 04:20:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:20:48 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:20:48 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
In-Reply-To: <199502082037.MAA02640@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <199502090419.UAA24497@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>

   Is there precedent for
   adding service-by-mail functionality in this way?  

You mean, like MIME?

   (Maybe "Latency"
   might be used in a future extension of RFC822 for some other meaning than
   what we are using it for.)

The command should be Add-Delay: if you want to acheive the result of
some latency.  (Those who don't recognize the double-edged nature of
this remark are welcome to make fools of themselves in public.)

Eric





Thread