1995-02-11 - Re: MIME based remailing commands

Header Data

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4de91fd7919cd958345c6a6ee448f23c99fc939ab6075cda78df250de64be832
Message ID: <9502110516.AA15719@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-11 05:21:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 21:21:24 PST

Raw message

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 21:21:24 PST
To: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
Message-ID: <9502110516.AA15719@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>	It doesn't matter if they disagree. If you don't have a To:
>line in the header then "Apparently-To:" gets tacked on using the "To"
>from the envelope.

... And all CC recipient and all BCC recipients as well.
	/r$

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”

• 1995-02-11 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 21:21:24 PST) - Re: MIME based remailing commands - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>