From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
To: “Paul E. Baclace” <peb@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 6bff129fc0110850b98c9c545725f9ec1f27f125c25fb9c9ce31fdbbc1900ea4
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.90.950203131758.22196B-100000@use.usit.net>
Reply To: <199502031709.JAA20821@netcom20.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-03 18:24:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 10:24:21 PST
From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 95 10:24:21 PST
To: "Paul E. Baclace" <peb@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
In-Reply-To: <199502031709.JAA20821@netcom20.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.90.950203131758.22196B-100000@use.usit.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
There really is a CP thread here.
After you've had one of these experiences, you will not trust
authority any more.
I can't wait for the "good faith" exeception to the 4th amendment
to hit the streets.
bd
On Fri, 3 Feb 1995, Paul E. Baclace wrote:
> Recently a relative of mine was battered/assulted in a park. The
> perp, after a personal item broke, called a friend at the police on
> his cel phone and an officer charged my relative for assault! The
> perp is also trying to sue for damages. The relative is nearly at
> retirement age and the perp had 3 large attack dogs at the time.
> This is a bad cop with a vindictive mentality and the court so far
> believes the cop. (My relative should be suing for psychological damages
> after weeks of nightmares about being attacked and then betrayed
> by the police and fear of retribution for pursuing justice. This
> is a very expensive process in money, time and emotions.)
>
> A personal recording of what happened would make a lot of difference.
>
> Paul E. Baclace
> peb@netcom.com
>
Return to February 1995
Return to “peb@netcom.com (Paul E. Baclace)”