From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
To: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Message Hash: 76da76af69ca7c8abdd9d9e020cfcddef09d463705c48a5c1d0721b56b7babed
Message ID: <9502101755.AA04883@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950208020311.25943A-100000@mirage.skypoint.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 17:57:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:57:50 PST
From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 09:57:50 PST
To: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Subject: Re: URGENT - What S.314 Would Do
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950208020311.25943A-100000@mirage.skypoint.com>
Message-ID: <9502101755.AA04883@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 02:18:27 -0600 (CST)
From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
. . .
> (B) [makes a telephone call, whether or not conversation
> ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to
> annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called
> number] makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications
> device, whether or not conversation or communications ensues,
> without disclosing his identity with intent to annoy, abuse,
> threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who
> receives the communication;
Ding...Ding...Ding... We have another winner. Goodbye remailers. Probably
90% of remailer traffic violates this one. Well boys and girls we'd
better get lots more offshore...soon.
Actually, unless the quote dropped important context, this part
doesn't seem to outlaw remailers, but rather certain classes of
remailer use (``makes a call'', ``utilizes...''). It is the user, not
the provider that this seems to address.
--
Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com> Please do not send electronic junk mail!
Lehman Brothers Inc.
3 World Financial Center "The more laws and order are made prominent, the
New York, NY 10285-1100 more thieves and robbers there will be." --Lao Tzu
Return to February 1995
Return to “slowdog@wookie.net (slowdog)”