From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 19:28:34 PST
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
Message-ID: <199502070328.AA11135@mail.eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

tcmay@netcom.com wrote:

> Chaumian digital mixes--what you Americans call "remailers"--mainly
> solves the sender anonymity problem. Message pools, or broadcast to a
> group or site that includes the receiver, mainly deals with receiver
> anonymity. The combination of the two deals with both.
> 
> Both are solved elegantly with the Dining Cryptographer's Protocol,
> about which much is written on this list every few months. Messages
> are "sent" in an Ouija-board fashion and received by the person who
> can successfully decrypt a public message sent over the system.

I tend to favor remailers + broadcasting + anonymous-return-addresss
over the DC-Net protocol.  Let me list some of their relative 
advantages and disadvantages.  Please add to these if you can think
of more...

Advantages of DC-Net over remailers

	- more flexible trust relationships - you can add your buddies to 
		the set of people who have to be compromised to trace you
	- lower latency - don't have to wait for remailers to collect enough 
		mail for batches
	- untracibility need not depend on assumptions about the enemy's
		computational power

Disadvantages of DC-Net

	- complexity - explaining the core concepts of a remailer takes only 
		a couple of lines, as opposed to a couple of screens for a DC-Net
		Implementation of a DC-Net seems to be an order of magnitude
		harder as well.
	- more vulnerable to denial of service attacks
	- MUCH higher bandwidth costs

I think over the long run the last factor will be most important.  In 
a DC-Net, for each bit one participant wants to send to another, EVERY
OTHER participant must broadcast a bit to ALL participants.  I can 
imagine a remailer-net with one million users, but I don't see any 
possibility that a DC-Net can be scaled to that size.

Wei Dai


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBLzboXjl0sXKgdnV5AQEqqAP+JU2sgiESnFZm+CCgNNboXnL3uKg0GP4Z
y6NV+U56yGvPKzsi9suUiOpbuzwsYVaMnWIuqRCOaxic75SFsDi0NvjE1K4JgyXz
aoyVs1i+xlFKnfmZr1+7EAheUq7wlfSWdp0cnAhbNWSrC3cSuDiNGYciJQLW8GGv
3YUvmW+Xoj0=
=Aa+t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

E-mail: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>   URL: "http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai"
=================== Exponential Increase of Complexity ===================
--> singularity --> atoms --> macromolecules --> biological evolution
--> central nervous systems --> symbolic communication --> homo sapiens
--> digital computers --> internetworking --> close-coupled automation
--> broadband brain-to-net connections --> artificial intelligence
--> distributed consciousness --> group minds --> ? ? ?