From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8e1efd0935c41166144707016ed8ccd4be52b14eb53181676be530a0f47a6dfe
Message ID: <9502091907.AA13921@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 19:11:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 11:11:25 PST
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 11:11:25 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PEM
Message-ID: <9502091907.AA13921@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Har! Besides the certificate problems, are there other problems with
> PEM that have prevented its adoption?
That's it.
PEM "blew it" by relying on Internet-wide X.500/X.509 deployments.
They're now looking at self-signed certificates as a transition aide
to work around the adoption problems, particular in face of the pressure
brought by the success of PGP.
/r$
Return to February 1995
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 11:11:25 PST) - PEM - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>