1995-02-10 - GSM and cellular crypto

Header Data

From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9f9c074b631dec0532921a99c462052c9d4d72f0ef8a2d2cf23dd1e0066e4734
Message ID: <gate.og1B1c1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 14:56:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 06:56:02 PST

Raw message

From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 06:56:02 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: GSM and cellular crypto
Message-ID: <gate.og1B1c1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Richard Parrett (?) wrote:
> GSM uses less than strong encryption, by the way. I forget the
> technical details, but it is of the level that governments can
> fairly readily crack, but beyond the reach of most private
> organisations. (So no more 'Squidgy-gate'). It would, however,
> be quite feasible to add additional second stage encryption
> to phones (since the dataflow is digital point-point). I wonder
> if Nokia, a Finnish company well outside the scope of COCOM,
> might offer a feature like this.

All operaters of cellular networks in India are to use GSM, and Nokia has
been running an enormous ad campaign, it is very likely to be the market
leader in instruments. I don't know about any encryption provided, though.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Electric Dreams subscriptions and back issues, send a mail to
rishab@arbornet.org with 'get help' as the message Subject.

Rishab Aiyer Ghosh          rishab@dxm.ernet.in           rishab@arbornet.org
Vox +91 11 6853410 Voxmail 3760335       H 34C Saket, New Delhi 110017, INDIA  





Thread