1995-02-01 - Fundamental Question?
Header Data
From: Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a11cc94c1987f6ab0b1c87e94e512ffa5e7d7fd3b736d4a955fe9a31161011df
Message ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950201135326.29214A-100000@ns.interactive.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-01 18:54:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 Feb 95 10:54:36 PST
Raw message
From: Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 95 10:54:36 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Fundamental Question?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950201135326.29214A-100000@ns.interactive.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Although I understand the need for remailers for anonymity, is it not
true that the whole idea of encryption (good encryption, that is) is that
no matter who gets the encrypted text, it really doesn't matter? Does
this not mean that something like USENET is *perfect* for this?
-Anthony
Thread
Return to February 1995
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>”
- Return to “Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>”
- Return to “Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>”
Return to “Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>”
- 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 10:54:36 PST) - Fundamental Question? - Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
- 1995-02-01 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 11:12:48 PST) - Re: Fundamental Question? - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
- 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 20:00:37 PST) - Re: Fundamental Question? - Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
- 1995-02-02 (Wed, 1 Feb 95 20:48:07 PST) - Re: Fundamental Question? - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
- 1995-02-02 (Thu, 2 Feb 95 10:18:38 PST) - Re: Fundamental Question? - Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>