1995-02-13 - Re: standards…

Header Data

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a182c4bd26ba11ca63d6c07956f74acab8175aea2c4452d3427175b26c05f191
Message ID: <9502132044.AA24186@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-13 20:46:28 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 12:46:28 PST

Raw message

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 12:46:28 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: standards...
Message-ID: <9502132044.AA24186@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> > AFAIK, RSA is the only feasible PK scheme available.  There's eliptic
> > curves, of course, but that's patented.
> There are plenty of others, like Rabin's scheme, that are quite
> practical, but just not used because they are all collectively
> patented. After that patent expires in '97 things may change.

There are different uses for public-key systems, and some systems
support some but not all of the uses.  For instance,
Diffie-Hellman is useful for key exchage (and patented till 1997),
and the NIST/NSA's DSS Digital Signature Standard is useful for signatures,
especially if you like subliminal channels in your signatures :-), 
though the patent status depends on whether you believe NIST or RSA ....





Thread