1995-02-08 - To clear this up.

Header Data

From: “Craig A. Johnston” <caj@tower.techwood.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (cypherpunks mailing list)
Message Hash: a69a2151f78192534b4cdcf270248e5888b569ad7b490d883d6cb4f870ce8ca4
Message ID: <199502082158.NAA00214@tower.techwood.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-08 21:59:01 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:59:01 PST

Raw message

From: "Craig A. Johnston" <caj@tower.techwood.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:59:01 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (cypherpunks mailing list)
Subject: To clear this up.
Message-ID: <199502082158.NAA00214@tower.techwood.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Something needs clearing up:

I am not a Judges-L sympathizer.  The previous message was posted
at the request of David Stodolsky.  I am subscribed to the list to
see what is going on.  I find the idea of the Judges-L to be repulsive,
personally, as I have told DS and others.

I saw no harm in relaying this message to the list.  All it is likely
to do is create more anti-Judges-L sentiment.  David Stodolsky
claims that they have no desire to hide their FAQ, but that he wishes
for it to be distributed in a controlled fashion.  

To engage in what I deem "fair use": "...disclosure in the wrong context,
or at the wrong time can cause trouble..."

A beaut.

In sum, I find Judges-L repulsive and plan to keep an eye on it.

-Craig Johnston





Thread