From: storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a779f8136c078d06d10dcc2256dfb8e3145bab69ef1c9b7afc6a4fbe1914d198
Message ID: <AbxElKJXYzk0078yn@ssnet.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950209140130.8757A-100000@chewy.wookie.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-10 22:59:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:59:09 PST
From: storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:59:09 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: S. 314 and existing situation
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950209140130.8757A-100000@chewy.wookie.net>
Message-ID: <AbxElKJXYzk0078yn@ssnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.950209140130.8757A-100000@chewy.wookie.net>,
slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net> wrote:
>
> Hard to tell from this bill what the deal is on this. Common carriers
> aren;t completely immune from prosecution or lawsuit or whatnot to begin
> with. But in addition, S.314 introduces "transmit or otherwise make
> available" into the language of the law. Which makes the -carrier- of the
> "offending" information responsible.
Interesting point, there.
Following from that:
Telecoms have bucks.
Telecoms have lawyers.
Telecoms are the 'transmission' agents for pretty much all of
the internet. Even high speed dedicated T1s are usually
from a telecom or two.
Can we get them involved?
--
America - a country so rich and so strong we can reward the lazy
and punish the productive and still survive (so far)
Know your Constitution (void where prohibited)
Return to February 1995
Return to “Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>”