From: daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b1ca3c6926671a3811cbcb06cff31f96eb7ac4656ff64441fa059a154cdc4767
Message ID: <199502030441.UAA17143@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-03 04:44:04 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 20:44:04 PST
From: daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 20:44:04 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
Message-ID: <199502030441.UAA17143@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
You wrote:
>> We have potential bugging devices in all our houses - The telephone!
>> Of course, when it is onhook, the microphone does not transmit... or
>> does it?
>
>The Mondo article ("Total Surveillance" by Charles Ostman) was a joke.
>
>From the innacuracies in what I do know about, I assume all of the
>phone-paranoia is also unjustified.
Actually, there is a germ of truth in this. On older phones (don't know if
this works on newer electronic phones) when the handset is 'on-hook' a
switch opens and breaks the voice circuit. This of course only works for
DC circuits. If you drive that same circuit with an AC signal (from
further up the line) then that 'open' switch becomes a capacitor and acts
as a band-pass filter. Signals from the mic will then modulate that AC
current and can be extracted and reconstructed. Supposedly the Dutch
police have perfected this and use it in investigations to circumvent legal
restrictions on physically bugging suspects homes; or so was alleged a
couple of years ago during a narcotics trial in Amsterdam.
Dale H.
Return to February 1995
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”