From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c26878d413d58a4eaeabc39f7694f26a8ad5186e4612d43bd0b31e0293d9dd35
Message ID: <9502132110.AA24519@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-13 21:54:28 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:54:28 PST
From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:54:28 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2)
Message-ID: <9502132110.AA24519@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sigh. Some anonymous poster drags up "Christopher Seline"'s
wildly inaccurate article about TEMPEST. Aside from having a reverse-
engineered deacronymization of TEMPEST (which isn't an acronym and
isn't about Transient Electromagnetic Pulses), misunderstanding
TEMPEST certification, not getting its legalities right,
it's in general just plain confused and sensationalist.
Bill
Return to February 1995
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com”
1995-02-13 (Mon, 13 Feb 95 13:54:28 PST) - Re: TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2) - wcs@anchor.ho.att.com