1995-07-19 - RE: Stego-Rants ?

Header Data

From: Bolivar Shagnasty <tj@compassnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 02af96de9b46eb8d21fb12838a27568f49ffc2408cd94e71a0321bb37d5bf792
Message ID: <Chameleon.4.01.2.950719024816.tj@tjunker.compassnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-19 07:49:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 Jul 95 00:49:06 PDT

Raw message

From: Bolivar Shagnasty <tj@compassnet.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 95 00:49:06 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Stego-Rants ?
Message-ID: <Chameleon.4.01.2.950719024816.tj@tjunker.compassnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Which of the following is the cleartext?
----------------------------------------

1. Bit and byte dropout can significantly impede communication.

2. Flower and shrub planting can greatly enhance landscaping.

3. Word and phrase substitution can hopelessly disguise meaning.

4. UFO and space-alien belief can seriously damage credibility.


If you *presume* my context, you easily identify (3).  If only the wordlists 
that translate between (1), (2) and (4) were available for your inspection, 
you would be up the creek but you wouldn't know it.

Yes, this is aba's "exxon" at work again, and yes, it seems to me that 
deniability through other-plausible-meaning is viable as a form of stego.  
Grammatical correctness is easy to maintain, and care in choosing words can 
preserve much apparent meaning.

Bolivar







Thread