1995-07-13 - Re: Anti-Electronic Racketeering Act of 1995

Header Data

From: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 15050ee6fa9915ce94ad515709345942d6aa3df6f9240036e93fa23202410de4
Message ID: <199507131932.PAA01245@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-13 19:34:50 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 12:34:50 PDT

Raw message

From: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 12:34:50 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anti-Electronic Racketeering Act of 1995
Message-ID: <199507131932.PAA01245@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Weld Pond <weld@l0pht.com> responding to

Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> 

<good discussion snipped>

wrote:


>That raises an interesting issue. 

<good discussion snipped>

>Will they have to invent a huge new bureaucracy
>to manage all these devices and programs? 

Talk about a self-answering question...How else could it be done?

>There are many problems with this idea of 
>Government Access to Devices or Programs (GADOP).  

I can think of only one problem with the idea,
it's called the Bill of Rights.
[If there is anything left of it after this session of Congress.]

>A toolset that could build many different encryption 
>and decryption variations based on psuedo-random input
>may be a good tool to fight this nonsense.

Agreed. As well as steganographic software of many kinds
to hide this terrible "crime" we all love to commit, for
the peace loving among us...

BUT [and I hope this doesn't happen.]
I fear that the anarchy resulting from this kind of statist
idiocy will lead many (otherwise peaceful) folks to think that the
only good tool to fight this nonsense is a good shotgun. 
Of course, then we can simply outlaw those, too. 

<good discussion snipped>
Regards,
Jim Ray


- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Freedom isn't Freeh

iQCVAwUBMAVlCG1lp8bpvW01AQEkAgP/doDZKY1TKgBJPy7ame16kbqU0F+BOfl/
wuIkpnsnsoyyV6Fi7KzHPLGsZU+uuMjdxLyOhtmvswKAfq6XU68GTfHuCCImiE8D
6RuaPWkn+eAQmVhXrbmf2ykZwWrnLZ4sT12eyNQjKoavuxTgFPGFqbvIASnIwe/E
OLBNyviUOSA=
=M7wP
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMAV0pSoZzwIn1bdtAQFPDgGAu5kR4N1OlOm++LZZX4AAraYFbcgwhRiq
qN7x31Enfv4Gaocg0m4TmB4YYdJxyzht
=WV8f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread