From: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Message Hash: 21cbe6e4b52ddc353c0f6636e83a50ef29e79a1fcfc980b690c751204711b67b
Message ID: <199507291757.RAA10336@maalox>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-29 18:15:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 11:15:27 PDT
From: Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 11:15:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Subject: The little sex kitten
Message-ID: <199507291757.RAA10336@maalox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
I don't know if this item has been posted here yet, but someone just
emailed it to me, and I thought you folks might enjoy it.
-prz
----
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 13:53:02 -0400
Subject: The little sex kitten
JUDGE RULES ON E-MAIL PRIVACY CASE
TULSA, OKLA -- The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled on a case that many
legal experts believe clearly delineates the e-mail privacy rights of
computer users in the workplace. Judge Stan Musing declared that employees
have a right to expect that their empolyers will refrain from monitoring
e-mail messages transmitted on company systems. The case went to court
after programmer Augustus Lindsey's supervisor monitored his e-mail and
intercepted a message from Lindsey to a colleague. The message read:
"That little sex kitten has been driving me wild. She's moaning and begging
for it every minute. Last night I was afraid someone would hear, and we'd
be thrown out of the building. But don't worry -- all is arranged.
Wednesday she gets the knife". Lindsey's supervisor alerted authorities,
suspecting that a crime was in the making. Lindsey was arrested on the spot
and spent an uncomfortable night discussing the situation with the police.
However, he was released in the morning, just in time to get his female
cat to the vet for spaying. Lindsey sued his boss for invasion of privacy
and sought punitive damages as well.
----
Return to July 1995
Return to “Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>”
1995-07-29 (Sat, 29 Jul 95 11:15:27 PDT) - The little sex kitten - Philip Zimmermann <prz@acm.org>