From: stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3d9ce4af70a435610461e2e06a9cbfb7e7b9238513f92493f0a82f0e5c389ef2
Message ID: <199507140918.CAA04669@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-14 09:20:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:20:11 PDT
From: stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:20:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fight, or Roll Over?
Message-ID: <199507140918.CAA04669@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 03:56 PM 7/13/95 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>criminalizes groups which support This Year's Enemies. (Like the War with
>Oceania--or was it Eurasia?--the friend of today was yesterday's criminal
>organization.
Wow! The Oceania folks haven't even raised enough funds to make a credible
floating city, and already they're at war!? (Or, alternatively,
No, Oceania's always been at war with _East_asia...)
>Some would say this means Cypherpunks should step into the fray and become
>a lobbying group. I don't see us as having the structure or organization to
>become such a group. Those who wish to should probably form a real group to
>do this, with bylaws and elected officials.
There's already an EFF, and lobbying probably looks better with our EFF hats
on than with Cypherpunks hats and non-exportable T-Shirts on. Cypherpunks
is more for lobbying the public by putting out code than for lobbying CONgress.
>Anarchies are great, but there's no way an anarchy can have a "spokesman,"
>or a budget for travel and lobbying, or a hundred other things that a
>lobbying group needs. Cypherpunks--this list--is just not in a position to
>be this group.
Consensus-oriented coalitions can also work marvelously inefficiently :-)
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, Freelance Information Architect, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Return to July 1995
Return to “stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)”
1995-07-14 (Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:20:11 PDT) - Re: Fight, or Roll Over? - stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)