1995-07-12 - Re: general RC4 key searcher: optimisations anyone?

Header Data

From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: “Jonathan Shekter” <jshekter@alias.com>
Message Hash: 52a53c0a0d2788bf6797e47a27e6ed37444726bbe5e5499daf95843fe8059100
Message ID: <9507121753.AA08575@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <9507121259.ZM1196@lennon.alias.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-12 17:53:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 Jul 95 10:53:54 PDT

Raw message

From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 95 10:53:54 PDT
To: "Jonathan Shekter" <jshekter@alias.com>
Subject: Re: general RC4 key searcher: optimisations anyone?
In-Reply-To: <9507121259.ZM1196@lennon.alias.com>
Message-ID: <9507121753.AA08575@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jonathan Shekter writes:
 > >After all, the kind of really high powered systems that can make a
 > >large dent in the key space are not running Windows NT.
 > 
 > 	Umm... ever hear of an Alpha?

Also, I've been quite impressed with the Pentium times.  It must have
something to do with the "friendliness" towards byte operations in the
Intel architecture.


(Also also, I should note that one can only have sympathy for anybody
trying to run NT on anything *but* a high-powered system :-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Nobody's going to listen to you if you just | Mike McNally (m5@tivoli.com) |
| stand there and flap your arms like a fish. | Tivoli Systems, Austin TX    |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Thread