1995-07-31 - Re: The little sex kitten

Header Data

From: hoz@univel.telescan.com (rick hoselton)
To: sameer@c2.org (sameer)
Message Hash: 705dba1747b6612d0ba93047ba80946d6889c2c89c8a54d58551f55dafba13b3
Message ID: <9507310742.AA17010@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-31 07:42:04 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 31 Jul 95 00:42:04 PDT

Raw message

From: hoz@univel.telescan.com (rick hoselton)
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 95 00:42:04 PDT
To: sameer@c2.org (sameer)
Subject: Re: The little sex kitten
Message-ID: <9507310742.AA17010@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>> ...scumbags I work for sprang just such a document on us....
>> I actually did sign....

Did you promise not to use strong crypto?  

My (definitely NOT scumbag etc.) employer has notified all 
email users that email is NOT private.  As far as I know, 
(and I think I WOULD know) management has never examined email 
not addressed to them, but if they felt it was justified, 
I'm sure they would.  After all, it is their computer.....

Its not censorship when you refuse to pay for the podium!
Rick F. Hoselton  (who doesn't claim to present opinions for others)





Thread