From: “Peter Trei” <trei>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8216e734c86878d4db0d27a1e3477730513ff288b86a378b410e947f5a954eaf
Message ID: <9507181425.AA10035@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-18 14:25:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 07:25:52 PDT
From: "Peter Trei" <trei>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 07:25:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anti-Electronic Racketeering Act of 1995 (fwd)
Message-ID: <9507181425.AA10035@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I remember one of the sponsors of the CDA ranting about pornographers
> "profiteering" from pornographic images on the Internet, blissfully unaware
> that stuff downloaded from alt.sex.binaries.insert.your.fetish.here doesn't
> profit anyone but the phone company (for the hours you stay online to get
> it).
I called up Exon's press secretary and asked him about this. He
claimed that BBS's were uploading advertisments to the Net, and this
was the 'profiteering' referred to. He was immune to reason on this,
and felt that the CMU 'study' was rigorous.
It's true that a some of the pics in those groups include stamped-in
BBS names and phone numbers, but my impression was always that this
was the BBS operators trying to do a little damage control - so that
when random users post their pix (on which they claim copyright,
ignoring the fact that most of their scans rip off magazine
publishers), they can recognize the 'piracy', and also earn a little
publicity.
For a good backgrounder on the story, check
http://www.cybernothing.org/cno/reports/cyberporn.html
Peter Trei
ptrei@acm.org
Peter Trei
Senior Software Engineer
Purveyor Development Team
Process Software Corporation
trei@process.com
Return to July 1995
Return to “[“Peter Trei”
1995-07-18 (Tue, 18 Jul 95 07:25:52 PDT) - Re: Anti-Electronic Racketeering Act of 1995 (fwd) - “Peter Trei” <trei>