1995-07-31 - Re: The little sex kitten

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
Message Hash: 93b0667c21aa60dd3c5cd7482b1426ca3789562dc086ee279c31ca645ef53355
Message ID: <199507310618.XAA23903@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <v01530501ac4040bb01c2@[166.84.250.21]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-31 06:25:54 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 30 Jul 95 23:25:54 PDT

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 95 23:25:54 PDT
To: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
Subject: Re: The little sex kitten
In-Reply-To: <v01530501ac4040bb01c2@[166.84.250.21]>
Message-ID: <199507310618.XAA23903@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> The tightwad, privacy-loathing scumbags I work for sprang just such a
> document on us recently, and after squirming and bitching about it for a
> while, I actually did sign, simply because I wasn't prepared to lose my job
> at that point.  My fear, based on well-established tradition, is that
> eventually this will become widespread and more and more employers will
> monitor email, with coerced "consent."

	I really don't see what the big deal is. That's why you use a
commercial/non-work ISP for personal email, etc.

-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777
Network Administrator				Pager:	 510-321-1014
Community ConneXion: The NEXUS-Berkeley		Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest")			sameer@c2.org




Thread