1995-07-18 - Re: Automated Rant Generators and Letter Generators

Header Data

From: bart@netcom.com (Harry Bartholomew)
To: tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: ac6b4f735aca5b335b87d58a4de384c1e1bf6927c4ec8a3e3f5cefe0a4fb7298
Message ID: <199507181659.JAA10311@netcom18.netcom.com>
Reply To: <ac312fb403021004f23b@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-18 17:00:48 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 10:00:48 PDT

Raw message

From: bart@netcom.com (Harry Bartholomew)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 10:00:48 PDT
To: tcmay@sensemedia.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Automated Rant Generators and Letter Generators
In-Reply-To: <ac312fb403021004f23b@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199507181659.JAA10311@netcom18.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



    My motivation in suggesting the use of a pen-plotter to generate
    output was to make the letter appear to come from a flesh and
    blood human who doesn't do computers or even FAX.  Somewhere,
    perhaps from Jim Warren or the EFF, I had heard that the pols
    payed attention to handwritten letters far more than FAXs or
    email or phone calls.  The rant generator-to-postal mail gateway
    might give netters more leverage than we have now.





Thread