1995-07-21 - Re: Netscape the Big Win

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b202440f54c5a7c7e257b4028d281b2358954afa7373139e16a06a143ed41e4e
Message ID: <199507210142.VAA00150@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-21 01:44:36 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Jul 95 18:44:36 PDT

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 95 18:44:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscape the Big Win
Message-ID: <199507210142.VAA00150@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <ac33f977080210043230@[205.199.118.202]>, tcmay@sensemedia.net
(Timothy C. May) wrote:

>Frankly, one of the great boons of my current setup is that I can
>completely get away from Unix tools and commands, away from my Unix shell
>account at Netcom, away from the arcane commands that vary from program to
>program, away from tin and elm and emacs...my fingers are already
>forgetting the emacs commands!
>
>(Those of you like Unix, fine. I agree it is useful for many things, so I'm
>not trying to debate Unix vs. the world. Just giving my perspective, and
>apparently the perspective of the many who are adopting the Web browsers as
>their "operating environments," insulated from the underlying cruft.)

Is this the same T.C. May that used to argue vehemently that if it can't
be displayed on a VT52, it was no good? Did a space alien take over Tim?

- -- 
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMA8F3SoZzwIn1bdtAQHKegF9GZbdSEP4Q5LlQz6KdwapuCMS3v5i693V
GoyxCoWO/iEOR6M5kl7ASgkagzJgVMi8
=n2gM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread