1995-07-18 - Re: SurfWatch for employees (ugh)
Header Data
From: “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@warwick.com>
To: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Message Hash: c1dc309cb0445c0c62eeaefea76ef7b22d63fbee4346e9f39ec48c00b7103bb9
Message ID: <199507181311.JAA06412@cmyk.warwick.com>
Reply To: <199507180636.AA02056@ideath.goldenbear.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-18 13:12:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 06:12:25 PDT
Raw message
From: "Harry S. Hawk" <habs@warwick.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 06:12:25 PDT
To: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Subject: Re: SurfWatch for employees (ugh)
In-Reply-To: <199507180636.AA02056@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Message-ID: <199507181311.JAA06412@cmyk.warwick.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I don't think there is ever anything wrong with employeer's
restricting what employee's do on any legal or ethical level.
Evolution (a la Bionomics) will sort out the winners and losers.
/hawk
> or "only to these sites". The product also can be configured to log all
> Web usage by users subjected to its reign of terror. :) WebTrack
> are always appropriate, and indeed empowering. Neither WebTrack nor
Thread
Return to July 1995
- Return to “Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>”
- Return to ““Harry S. Hawk” <habs@warwick.com>”
Return to “rmtodd@servalan.servalan.com (Richard Todd)”
- 1995-07-18 (Tue, 18 Jul 95 00:17:26 PDT) - SurfWatch for employees (ugh) - Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
- 1995-07-18 (Tue, 18 Jul 95 06:12:25 PDT) - Re: SurfWatch for employees (ugh) - “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@warwick.com>
- 1995-07-18 (Tue, 18 Jul 95 11:03:53 PDT) - Re: SurfWatch for employees (ugh) - rmtodd@servalan.servalan.com (Richard Todd)