From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f48e0d355d1ae2f5292df10d3a54091d2e472f23bf053f244306bea2b487dc64
Message ID: <199507160827.EAA00243@crypto.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-16 08:18:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 16 Jul 95 01:18:30 PDT
From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 95 01:18:30 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Unix not the Only Place for "Vanguard" Applications
Message-ID: <199507160827.EAA00243@crypto.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cypherpunks, as they say, write code.
It doesn't really matter very much what platform cypherpunks write
code for, as long as we actually write code. Progress comes from
getting stuff done and making results available so that others can
expand on it and use it, not from sitting around optimizing what
should be done (by others, of course) in the future. (Ever notice
how, every time this comes up, the question is always something
like "why aren't people writing more software for platform X?" and
never "I want to write some software - does anyone have any
suggestions on which platform would have the most impact?")
Every minute spent arguing about whether Unix, DOS, Macs or VIC-20s
constitute the optimal platform for writing and deploying crypto
software is a minute during which no crypto code is being written
or deployed for Unix, DOS, Macs, or VIC-20s.
Just write code. For whatever platform you like writing code for.
-matt
Return to July 1995
Return to “Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>”
1995-07-16 (Sun, 16 Jul 95 01:18:30 PDT) - Re: Unix not the Only Place for “Vanguard” Applications - Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>