1995-07-13 - Re: co-sponsors
Header Data
From: cman@communities.com (Douglas Barnes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fca90471bd82136cd02086dd7585073299492ba04c29095f8df3328ba7ed97bb
Message ID: <v02120d1cac2aaebb8090@[199.2.22.120]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-13 22:07:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 15:07:17 PDT
Raw message
From: cman@communities.com (Douglas Barnes)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 15:07:17 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: co-sponsors
Message-ID: <v02120d1cac2aaebb8090@[199.2.22.120]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I searched Thomas and couldn't find any evidence of co-sponsors to the
>Senate bill. Am I wrong here?
>
>.pm
According to Shari Steele:
> Fortunately, the bill does not have a very promising future. The bill has
> no co-sponsors. It was immediately referred to the Committee on the
> Judiciary, where it currently sits. LEXIS's bill tracking report only
> gives it a 10% chance of passing out of the committee.
Thread
Return to July 1995
- Return to “cman@communities.com (Douglas Barnes)”
Return to “David HM Spector <spector@zeitgeist.com>”
- 1995-07-13 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 15:07:17 PDT) - Re: co-sponsors - cman@communities.com (Douglas Barnes)
- 1995-07-14 (Thu, 13 Jul 95 19:36:42 PDT) - Re: co-sponsors - David HM Spector <spector@zeitgeist.com>