From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 09a82353f72923fb6ecbc30c7d26e9ca9542b3fff80990743aacc23448f5524d
Message ID: <199508110619.CAA29700@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-11 06:21:36 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 23:21:36 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 23:21:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: This summer's special delivery?
Message-ID: <199508110619.CAA29700@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <ac4eb0c9030210046e6c@[205.199.118.202]>, tcmay@got.net
(Timothy C. May) wrote:
>I have nothing further to add on this. But recall that it was just about
>this time last year--just before Crypto--that the "alleged RC4 code" was
>posted anonymously to the list.
Do I recall correctly that that RC4 proved to interoperate with the "real" RC4?
- --
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMCr2PCoZzwIn1bdtAQEUPAF/S1arfdr01B+/o5MlEX6F60NHUL6vgEPQ
sv3264ZCsJAl7TBqqyi1a6baBF7uuTh+
=jhLU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to August 1995
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”