From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: monty.harder@famend.com (MONTY HARDER)
Message Hash: 203a90edd93d26efacf7b2b7a38909e8ed95dc421cf5bf44746d8f317d367f29
Message ID: <199508310955.CAA19393@ix8.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-31 09:58:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 31 Aug 95 02:58:25 PDT
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 95 02:58:25 PDT
To: monty.harder@famend.com (MONTY HARDER)
Subject: Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman's Folly Fans Fakery Fears...
Message-ID: <199508310955.CAA19393@ix8.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:50 PM 8/30/95 -0500, you wrote:
> In =any= Key Escrow arrangement (including the non-government variety
> preferred by 4 out of 5 Cypherpunks in a recent survey)
> there must be a division between encryption keys and signature keys.
....
> Please don't mention to anyone the fact that my signature key can be
> used to send me something that even the escrow agents can't read....
Only if you use RSA. One of the neat things about RSA, as opposed to DH or
DSA/DSS, is that the same algorithm can do both signature and encryption.
Once we all have our Gummint-issue Citizen-Unit SmartCards with the
Web-Of-Mistrust Hierarchical Certification System,
people won't be able to use the DSS feature to send you encrypted messages
<fnord>Pay no attention to that man behind the subliminal
channel!</fnord>
but you can still use them for signatures, including checking escrow agency
signatures on your privacy key.
#---
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, Freelance Information Architect, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# Phone +1-510-247-0664 Pager/Voicemail 1-408-787-1281
#---
Return to August 1995
Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
1995-08-31 (Thu, 31 Aug 95 02:58:25 PDT) - Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman’s Folly Fans Fakery Fears… - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>